Facts About h4831sc load data Revealed
Facts About h4831sc load data Revealed
Blog Article
H1000 is on my would like listing of powders at the same time. Possibly the IMR Enduron sequence are going to be well preferred and I'm able to transfer to that for far better availability.
Obviously, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of various great deal numbers, but I believe I realize why. It is a litigation-driven entire world, and some idiot would undoubtedly deduce that he could blend H380 and H110 and come up with his have customized combination of powder. What a world.
The obvious result in is actually a tough/ruff bore. No level of copper fouling lessening agents while in the powder is going to appropriate this.
Caution applying SC or SSC produced loads with extensive Lower, again off and function up. Use Safe and sound loading approaches.
Anyway, I understood The 2 lbs of H4831SC used a similar data, but I didn't know no matter whether there was just about anything various concerning a pound of powder labeled "Excessive" and one not so labeled. A simply call to Hodgdon confirmed that they were in truth identical and the one variance was the logo to the label.
Apache Jct Excellent facts, I've jars of the two and often wondered if they may be reloaded Along with the very same recipes must I run out of one or one other.
Nampa, Idaho In my experience the one real variance is that the shortcut meters greater through reloading products. Once It truly is loaded theres no practical change. I've listened to which the shortcut may have a little little bit faster burn up amount but it seems insignificant.
Im under the knowing I want to use h4831sc. I have read that these powders are equivalent besides the shorter grain size of the sc. Should I nonetheless be on the lookout for h4381sc?
Along with the smoother move properties will come extra uniform demand weights, h4831 vs h4831sc though the person grains orient additional compactly, developing superior loading density.
locutus stated: I nevertheless have a fantastic stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows through my powder measures easily.
Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're entirely diverse powders, with IMR 4831 staying significantly faster in comparison to the Hodgdon variants. You should not treat them as exactly the same powder, as they most undoubtedly usually are not.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have got a limited supply of Varget, as well as a whole lot additional out there H4831SC. I shoot fifty h4831sc five gr. loads almost exclusively, simply because which is exactly what the rifles shoot the top.
Am i able to think that H4831 might be substituted for H4831sc ? I am aware h4831 vs h4831sc the Actual physical variation but will it impact the burn off or velocity? I feel not but I am not 100% positive.
I sawed 1 in fifty percent to find out how thick the jackets ended up, and so they were being very easily 2 times as thick as being a fifty-grain hollow issue was. Ditto to the 64-grain Power Issue, as these bullets are created for deer, not prairie puppies or woodchucks. You now know every little thing I find out about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I don't know everything in the least about the 223. I question that you are going to get wherever with that cartridge and 4831, but let us know how it goes.